Replacing Einstein's Relativity with Poincare's Law of Relativity

Replacing Einstein's Relativity with Poincare's Law of Relativity

We use Poincare's Law of Relativity to replace Einstein's Relativity

Juan Juan
9 min read

In a previous post, we mentioned how Poicare’s Law of Relativity can replace Einstein’s Relativity in order to restore the proper understanding of Nature. This will then lead to new spacetime technologies.

But how does Einstein’s Relativity trap humans on Earth without those new technologies?

Enshrining Limitation

Basically, Einstein limited the 5 Elements of Nature to just 3 Elements as:

  1. Earth (Strong Force)
  2. Water (Weak Force, this why neutrinos are only detectable in liquids)
  3. Fire (Electromagnetism)

The 2 other Elements of Air and Aether are invisible and so are invalid in shallow Physics.

The History of the Aether

In the 18th century, the wave-based nature of electromagnetism and of space were not well understood.

The corruption began in 1816, when Augustin Fresnel presented his wave theory which eventually became the luminiferous aether hypothesis.

Unlike Huygen’s aether which was based on the 2nd Element, Fresnel’s aether is based on the 3rd Element.

  • Huygen’s aether was based on vacuum as the space the light goes through in outer space
  • Fresnel’s aether was based on solid crystals as the space the light goes through in transparent solids

This is why Fresnel’s aether is STATIC that somehow gave light its wave properties. This was also eventually adopted by Maxwell.

So the Fresnel error corrupted the aether to be static outside but dynamic inside.

Since waves are directional, then there should be some drag from the opposite direction as to change the speed of light and make it variable.

  • This variable speed of light is consistent with Descartes’ Physics as proven by superluminal motion.

It means that the speed of light is constant within a vortex, but different outside of it.

  • Examples of vortices are Sun-vortex, Galaxy-vortex, Cluster-vortex, universe-vortex i.e. superluminal motion shows different speeds of light depending on vortex

The Michelson-Morley experiment correctly revealed that the speed of light was constant within the solar system in all directions.

  • In Descartes, theory c should be a bit different when measured in another star

But since the 19th century had a corrupted aether theory, they misinterpreted the findings.

This prompted Lorentz to create length contractions (1892), and Poincare to create the Law of Relativity (1902) in space.

  • This is really the changes in the 1st Element within the 2nd Element

Poincare’s Law of Relativity is based on a body’s current state (which we call the aetherspace, which is different from the aether) compared to its initial state and the current states of other bodies, all referencing the current absolute state of the system.

This is consistent with:

  • Descartes’ Rule 1 of state-change (since the Cartesian aether is arbitrary)
  • Descartes’ assertion that movement comes from the initial spin (vortex rotation) or state of the particle
  • the spin of Quantum Mechanics

Einstein Messes Up Physics

For some reason, Einstein comes out of nowhere in 1905 to hack Poincare’s Law of Relativity.

He enshrines the constancy of the speed of light and uses it as a measure of both space and time, disregarding Newton. This is wildly different from Poincare who allowed different times:

  • Newtonian time (3rd Element)
  • Electromagnetic time (1st Element)
  • Mental time (5th Element)

This flexibility of time is why Poincare wrote:

We have not a direct intuition of the equality of 2 intervals of time. The persons who believe they possess this intuition are dupes of an illusion.

Henri Poincare
Henri Poincare The Measure of Time

But Einstein duped everyone and locked space and time to light anyway. This led to E=mc^2 where m is really electromagnetic potential in active particles, and not Newtonian mass in static inertial ones.

This is why E=mc^2 works for uranium, but not for iron.

This led to nuclear fission at the expense of nuclear fusion which requires anti-gravity which is impossible under Einstein, but possible under Poincare.

Poincare’s Law of Relativity Matches Quantum Mechanics and James Webb Space Telescope

In Cartesian Physics, the speed of light varies in every star system dictated by that star’s vortex.

Image
  • Light is 300,000 km/s because that is how the sun wants it.
  • An atom has a certain number of electron shells (different from other atoms) because that’s how its nucleon wants it.

The electron has to follow those shells imposed by the nucleon’s territory just as light has to follow the speed imposed on it by the star’s territory.

To Einstein, the speed of light is constant EVERYWHERE. So it means that light from a distant galaxy 1 million light years away is 1 million years old.

But to Descartes, that light is at the current age.

For example, if your friend in Berlin starts a Zoom meeting at 9:00 pm Berlin Time, then you at Tokyo will start it at 4:00 am.

A lag of 1 second in the Zoom signal does not mean that Berlin started its meeting late by 1 second.

  • An Einsteinian would argue that if the lag were 1 hour then at 5am you would see your friend’s state at 9pm Berlin time (4am your time). You would be seeing a past or 1-hour younger version of your friend!

  • A Cartesian would reply that such a lag would mean something unnatural was blocking the signal, causing it to float in limbo for 1 hour.

But space telescopes see the light from distant galaxies continuously and not twinkling nor disrupted. So there should be no, or very little lag, in its information.

When we look at the stars, they do not seem “choppy” or change suddenly in size and color.

In reality, a laggy zoom meeting shows the current version of your friend but in a paused, choppy state.

This is why the James Webb Space Telescopes (JWST) shows all distant galaxies as having nearly the same look as ours, instead of being at their infancy. This is because they are also of the current age, not of a distant age.

The problem is that physicists have been conditioned to think that Einstein was a genius. And so they would rather concoct wacky new theories on early galaxy formation to match the data from JWST rather than the more common sense solution of dropping Relativity.

Einstein’s Relativity Must Flushed Out From the Study of Nature

The total refutation of Einstein’s Relativity is essential not only in matching the findings of JWST and Hubble. It is also needed to harmonize Classical Mechanics with Quantum Mechanics through the Cartesian Aether as a ‘Grand Unifying Theory’.

This unification will create the anti-gravity that is needed for nuclear fusion and space travel that is superior to nuclear fission and Newtonian rockets respectively.

Leave a Comment