Superphysics
Dharma as the Natural Organizing Principle
13 minutes • 2610 words
Table of contents
Dharma in Hinduism and Buddhism is the inherent nature of things, as designed by its maker. We can call it “inherent design”.
A baker who bakes a cake designs it as a cake and expects it to be a cake in the end.
- If it turns out to be a pie or a large biscuit, then it does not match its design or plan. In this case, it is called a bad or awful cake and is ‘adharmic’.
- If it turns out as a cake as designed, then it is good or ‘dharmic’*.
*Dharma and Smith’s invisible hand are supposed to come from Brahma and Providence (God) respectively. However, the idea of a superior God seems to drive away materialists and egotistic people who have been liberalized to view themselves as their own god and master of their own destiny. In fact, of the current large populations, only the Muslims seem to be the group that is amenable to having their will subservient to a divine being such as the concept of Allah.
As such, our definition of dharma mutes any references to God or any divine being. This is so that it can get a chance at mass adoption even by those materialists and egotistic people who are at the forefront of:
- destroying rainforests for big money
- driving inequality through profit-maximizing slave-wages
- speculative investments that raise asset prices for self-gain.
Only by giving them a positive reason to switch sides, while keeping their selfishness and ego, can there be hope for sustainability in the face of the global warming disasters and inequality that Economics has created through its blind focus on money-making. As they say, desperate times call for desperate measures.
Note that this only mutes God and does not cancel It. The unmuting can be done scientifically through the development of artificial intelligence which will reveal God to be a Matrix, and our existence to be a virtual reality inside the mind of God or Brahma.
In the Theory of Moral Sentiments, Adam Smith explains that the inherent design of an economy, as facilitated by an invisible hand, is to keep on producing utility for society.
The selfish landlord had to give up part of his crops to be given as wages to his employees so that they could maintain his agricultural system and keep up the production. Had he kept all of his crops for himself, there would be no one to grow the next batch. His estate’s economic system would then fail and become adharmic.
Thus, the personal interests of the landlord and his employees work together naturally to create a bigger public benefit. The farmers work on the fields for their inherent love of agriculture and not for society.
It is by this focus (not selfishness) that they were able to improve their skills and increase their productivity (personal interest) for the benefit of everyone as the public interest.
Every individual necessarily works to render the society’s annual revenue as great as he can. He generally does not intend to promote the public interest, or know how much he is promoting it.
By supporting domestic industry over foreign industry, he intends only his own security. By directing that industry to produce the greatest value [for society], he intends only his own gain.
In this case, as in many other cases, he is led by an invisible hand to promote an end which he did not intend.
Here, we replace selfish-interest with personal passion, to make everything coherent:
By pursuing his own self-interest passion, he frequently promotes the society’s interest more effectively than when he really intends to promote it.
I have never known much good done by those who affected to trade for the public good. It is an affectation not very common among merchants.
We can even replace it with specialization, overseen by the state, for more practical applications:
The art of war is certainly the noblest of all arts.. To make it perfect, it should be the sole or principal occupation of a class of citizens. The division of labour is:
- necessary for the improvement of this art as in every other art, and
- naturally introduced by the prudence of individuals.
They find that they promote their private interest specialization better by confining themselves to a particular trade than by exercising many. Only the state’s wisdom can render the soldier’s trade distinct from all others.
Socrates Division of Labor
This focus or passion leads to specialization or division of labor within an overall team or social effort. Unknown to many, it was Socrates, and not Smith, who first emphasized the importance of knowing one’s personal passion in relation to the common interest, as to create the division of labor.
Here, we replace the Greek word δίκαιος with “dharma”:
The division of labour which required the carpenter and the shoemaker and the rest of the citizens to be doing each his own business, and not another’s, was a shadow of dharma.
But in reality, dharma was concerned not with the outward man, but with the inward or the true self. The dharmic man does not permit the several elements within him to interfere with one another, or any of them to do the work of others.
He sets his own inner life in order, and he masters himself with his own law, to be at peace with himself. A man whose occupation is opposite of his passion has a sort of lameness.
Like Smith, Socrates* asserts that the common interest is promoted by personal passion through trade and employment. He also shows that such a passion leads to personal peace, exactly the kind that kings are fighting for, as described by Smith.
Socrates, however, adds a missing ingredient to achieving such a peace. He explains that a person’s focus on his personal passion will help him to discover his true self. This discovery of the true self is then the key to lasting peace.
*The topic of the book The Republic is not justice and injustice, but human dharma δίκαιος and adharma άδικος. Dharma is a concept applicable to Law, Morals, and Economics
We can even extend his idea onto Sociology in order to end wars between nations. For example, each country can define its own true nature, and then let others accept their definition and create treaties based on it*.
This is different from the current political system where a powerful country like the US pushes its own ego and nature onto weaker countries like Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan, totally disregarding their nature.
*This is called the idea of Constitutional Virtues . Update August 2021: The mistake of the US policy in Afghanistan was in imposing civilized Western democracy in a barbarous country. This is a contradiction of natures and explains the failure of the policy despite 20 years of hard work in establishing it.
Svadharma: The True Metaphysical Nature of an Entity
For this “true nature” to be a viable foundation for a socio-political science and system*, it must have been likewise advocated by other cultures. Luckily, we find that Hinduism has such a concept as svadharma and Taoism has the concept of the Tao.
Svadharma means self-dharma or the inherent nature of the self. It means one’s own path, nature, or destiny and is described in the Bhagavad Gita:
Nowadays, this is known as ‘keeping it real’ or ‘being true to oneself’, which is similar to the Tao, which is one’s own, natural way:
Human dharma would imply knowing the nature of others, while svadharma would be knowing and mastering oneself.
- A manufacturer who knows his core competencies will be a better manufacturer who is a jack of all trades and a master of none.
- An army squad made up of specialists will perform their missions better than one made up of general infantry.
To Socrates, this respect for everyone’s personal interest is the foundation of justice and therefore the basis for society. A society collapses when its members do not respect each others’ existential interests.
Policymakers Must Know Dharma
Smith wrote that governments must understand the invisible hand in order to create proper policies and avoid disorder:
The man of system is.. often so enamoured with.. his own ideal plan of government.. He imagines that he can arrange the members of a great society with as the hand arranges the pieces on a chess-board.
He does not consider that, in the great chess-board of human society, every single piece has a principle of motion of its own, altogether different from that which the legislature might choose to impress on it.
If those two principles.. act in the same direction, the game of human society will go on easily and harmoniously. If they are opposite, the game will go on miserably.
The best laws are those that match the collective dharma of their society and not just the personal interests of a few people. Thus, the invisble hand is never an external imposition, but rather an internal principle of movement – the same principles that make a fire burn or the wind blow.
The West eventually discovered the way to find this internal principle through suffrage or by asking everyone to express who should be their nation’s leader.
Nowadays, surveys and school exams are the most common ways to discover the interests of each person, and this is why education is very important. Asking a child what he wants to become is another common way, but even this is often not emphasized in some cultures.
A Supereconomy is an Economy within its Dharma
From here, we can now define our supereconomy as a system of resource allocation that is in line with the Tao or Dharma.
The definition of the Tao or Dharma then depends on the kind of discrete entity described, whether it be a family, company, nation, or planet.
We can now see how different the invisible hand described by Smith is from the one described by Samuelson. The proper invisible hand hand has public and personal aspects working together according to the designer of Nature:
Every individual is continually exerting himself to find out the most advantageous employment for whatever capital he can command. It is his own advantage which he has in view [svadharma], and not that of the society. But the study of his own advantage naturally leads him to prefer that employment which is most advantageous to society [human dharma].
That wisdom which contrived the system of human affections and that of every other part of nature, seems to have judged that the interest of the great society of mankind [human dharma] would be best promoted by directing the principal attention of each individual to what was most within the sphere of his abilities and understanding [svadharma].
The Invisible Hand in a Nutshell
- The Absolute Entity (Nirguna Brahma) was lonely
- To be un-lonely, It split Itself into infinite (arbitrary) selves and things to experience Its selves and things
- These selves and things have their own nature which represents a piece of the Nature of It
- This True Nature, as called by Socrates, is called Tao or Dharma in Asia, while ‘own nature’ is called svadharma
- The Invisible Hand is Its way of maintaining Its Nature and own natures for Its own purposes
- These maintaining processes manifest as natural systems such as gravitation, thermodynamics, symbiosis, societies, agriculture, governance, supply and demand via exchange, etc
- Such processes can be made artificial through human intervention such as technology, clockmaking, industrialization, reforestation, election systems, monetary systems, etc.
- Some human interventions might actually go against the Dharma, such as pollution, speculation, nuclear weapons, deforestation, election-rigging, tax evasion, etc. These destroy instead of maintain.
Examples of the Invisible Hand in Action
While Samuelson applies the invisible hand shallowly to justify deregulation and personal selfishness, Smith’s invisible hand is applicable to so many non-business and non-selfish aspects of human life:
- A student who follows his true passion of studying a course that his parents might not like, and then being more useful to society despite having less revenue (such as being a nurse instead of a lawyer)
- A software developer who is confident with his skills so he becomes a freelancer or sets up his own software consultancy and gets more revenue instead of working for someone else
- An army captain taking the initiative to save his men from the enemy fire instead of waiting for orders from headquarters, and then getting a medal for it without expecting it (since a medal is worthless to a dead soldier)
- People protesting a law that might be beneficial to a small sector, but harmful to the rest of society
- A citizen cleaning up the mess in his neighborhood himself, instead of waiting for the local government to do it
- A country taking time to understand the interest of another country when making a new trade deal
With this, we can now expand the scope of the invisible hand beyond business and trade, and into politics, education, organizations, society, and even onto physics and healthcare. This makes it a fundamental principle similar to the principles of karma and shiva-shakti that permeates the whole of our proposed Superphysics (Material, Medical, and Social).
Smith gave other types of invisible hand in The Theory of Moral Sentiments that mirror the observations made by Hindus, which we can simplify as follows:
