Taxation Maxims
December 20, 2017 4 minutes • 680 words
Table of contents
-
Four Taxation Maxims
- Maxim 1: People should contribute towards supporting their government in proportion to their respective abilities
- Maxim 2: The tax which each person pays must be certain and not arbitrary
- Maxim 3: Every tax should be levied at the time and manner most convenient for the taxpayer
- Maxim 4: Taxes should take out as little as possible from the people over and above what it brings into the public treasury
- Applying the Maxims
- Tax Conclusion: Revise the Tax
Four Taxation Maxims
Adam Smith gave 4 maxims on taxation in The Wealth of Nations that have been largely forgotten today. Taxes should be fair, non-arbitrary, cost-effective and convenient.
We implement his maxims in our proposed “Flow” Taxation system which is based on points.
Maxim 1: People should contribute towards supporting their government in proportion to their respective abilities
The rich or those who have the ability topay more should pay more than those who are less able to. Smith’s pro-poor taxation policies are found in Book 5, Chapter 2, and are as clear as day:
Maxim 2: The tax which each person pays must be certain and not arbitrary
This maxim applies to the valuation of certain taxes, such as land taxes.
Maxim 3: Every tax should be levied at the time and manner most convenient for the taxpayer
Smith gives an example of this in the excise and customs duties:
Maxim 4: Taxes should take out as little as possible from the people over and above what it brings into the public treasury
For this, Smith mentions the inefficient collection method of certain taxes:
Applying the Maxims
We use these maxims on current taxes to see if they pass. This will then determine whether the tax is just or if it needs to be revised. In this example, we will apply it to income taxes which are assessed according to ’tax brackets’ and exemptions, by running four tests.
Test 1: Is it proportional to the ability of the person to pay?
The income tax in this case is progressive–the rate increases with the increase in the base taxable income. So it somewhat passes the first test by allowing the less-able-to-pay pay less. However, it is uncertain whether such a tax rate would be really fair because there is no information on the socio-economic conditions of the people being taxed.
Result: Pass SomewhatTest 2: Is it certain and not arbitrary?
Since the amount to be paid can be arrived at clearly by using the table, this tax passes the second test.
Result: PassTest 3: Is it convenient?
The convenience of the tax in this case is not so perfect since, just from the information given, it is evident that computations must be done and that the filing requirementsmight cause added burdens to the taxpayer.
Result: FailTest 4: Is it cost-efficient?
Since there is no information on the costs on collecting this kind of tax, we cannot run this test objectively. However, the advances in technology generally allow taxes to be administered via the internet and be paid via electronic bank transfers, reducing the cost in manual labour in the long run.
Result: PassTax Conclusion: Revise the Tax
The tax in this example needs to be revised to meet Maxim 3