How to Fix Einstein's General Relativity

While collating the works of Socrates in order to unify them with those of David Hume to harmonize Superphysics, I came upon his maxims on astrophysics:

Socrates is clearly against having any fixed ratio or absoluteness in the universe. This obviously debunks Newtonian Physics which has an idea for an absolute space:

However, he also mentioned that light (through sight) is not the measure of cosmic objects:

This also debunks Einstein’s Relativity wherein light is an essential component:

Therefore, the correct replacement to Newton and Einstein should:

• have no absolutes (i.e. be relative)
• work even without light

Descartes to the Rescue

Before Einstein and Newton, Rene Descartes already explained how the universe worked through the 5 Elements which we can call as the true “Standard Model” of Physics in completed form.

Unlike Newton who viewed space as absolute, Descartes viewed space as relative:

Like Einstein, he denied gravity coming from inside objects. But unlike Einstein’s Relativity which needed light, Descartes’ Relationality needed only 2 or more identities:

In the view of Cartesian Physics, the biggest evils of Relativity are:

1. It prevents artificial faster than light movement
2. It prevents aether propulsion which uses subtle energy and far less crude energy

Let’s Fix General Relativity!

To get rid of these evils, let’s convert General Relativity (GR) to Cartesian. GR has field equations made up of 4 basic components:

1. The Big Mass
2. The Small Mass
3. The Curvature around that Big Mass
4. How the Small Mass goes through that Curvature

We convert this to Cartesian Relationality:

This eliminates the complicated Curvature and how the Small Mass goes through that Curvature. This eliminates 3-dimensional curved geometry and brings back 2-dimensional Euclidean geometry.

The resulting 2-dimensional Euclidean geometry forms 3-dimensional curved geometry when the object is traced along the plane or apparent space-time.

The ratios between the 2 objects while being traced within the plane are notated through Francis Bacon Tables. These can then project the future positions of the object/s even if both are moving.

The combination of Descartes and Bacon lead to a simpler and more robust way to plot the movement of objects going very fast. More importantly, light is not critical to this system.

For example, we use it to plot the movement of:

• person twards disease in Medical Superphysics
• lover towards lover in Social Superphysics
• country towards prosperity also in Economic Superphysics

In the future, we can use it to plot or predict:

• the probablities of what a particle will decay into
• the movement of an object from location A to B using the aether
• the growth of plants from one height or quality towards another

Meets Socrates’ Requirements

Cartesian Physics meets Socrates’ requirements of:

• having no absolutes (i.e. be relative)
• working even without light

This is why it makes up most of Material Superphysics, with minor tweaks from the Asian sciences of Hinduism, Taoism, and Buddhism in order to explain how the physical universe works.