Qualimath: The Math for Superphysics

Chapter 4 explained that reality is made up of long perception-chains of cause and effects, called by the Hindus as ‘‘karma-samskara-karma’.

A long series of chains gains the dynamics of a wave. This wave we can split into 3 states:

1. Karma-Action State 1
2. Samskara-Pending Pseudo-State
3. Karma-Reaction State 2

We can extend this wave to have more states.

We can know why State 4 is the way it is if we look at all its states from 1 to 4. We can then use this knowledge to predict its future states. We can write this as:

State 1 : State 2 : State 3 :: State 4

We do not notate the pseudostates that are in between:

• state 1 and 2
• state 2 and 3
• state 3 and 4

This is because they are pending reactions and have no objective manifestation in reality YET.

The colon means ‘relative to’ or ‘compared to’, and is a fundamental part of our proposed ‘Qualimath’.

This is a combination of the ideas from:

• The Asian sciences of Hinduism, Buddhism, and Taoism which say that everything is one
• Socratic philosophy which explains about the One and the Other
• Descartes’ theory of gravity which says that gravity is a relation between bodies
• Poincare’s Law of Relativity which is based on changing states of bodies in a system

We call this Cartesian relationality, which depends on point of view:

In this way, relationality is built into even the most elementary equations, such as those taught for kids. Rather, it is baked into Descartes’ 2nd Rule of Motion which is about state-change instead of inertia. And so we can safely throw away everything that Einstein made.

This is different from normal math which uses ‘deltas’.

• Those deltas compare the object with itself at different states.
• This is because math focuses on the object itself, and not on the totality of the reality where that object is in.

Math Versus Qualimath

For example, a basic math equation is 1 + 1 = 2. This can be visualized by:

Notice how this is overly simplistic and does not expand on cause and effect. This is because math uses a constricted mindset that really relies on the Conservation of Ideas.

This is why math-people can flip or transpose things. For example, 1 + 1 = 2 can be transposed to 2 = 1 + 1. This is because the = sign “conserves` the values on both sides.

The problem is that this is for closed, finite things and does not work for things that cross over to the aethereal layer. For example, the mass of a subatomic particle might be:

1 + 1 = 2.0000123

Math will be unable to explain where the .0000123 came from, which Superphysics explains could come from the upper layers or by abnormal properties of the particle in certain situations.

To fix this, we turn 1 + 1 = 2 into qualimath by adding the necessary parts:

Here, we expose that the focus of the equation or line is itself. The qualimath ratio is State 1 :: State 2 which we deconstruct as:

(1 + 1) :: 2

This leads to the same output as the 1 + 1 = 2 of normal math, while imposing the following mental changes:

• 1 + 1 is a rigid ratio of 2, not an equality. It means it is confined to specific layer and does not cross over to other layers. This is useful when it comes to constants

• Both sides have the same importance
• A straight-line equation would imply that the focus is on the line itself.

The concept of a focus is super important as it is the basis of:

• gravitational signatures
• the hierarchy of the universe
• Descartes’ First and Third Rules of Movement

But for 1 + 1 = 2.0000123, we use a different ratio:

(1 + 1) : 2.0000123

This means that the inequality is caused by something unknown. Provisionally, we fix this with:

(1 + 1) : 0.0000123 aether : 2.0000123

The 0.0000123 aether is a value from the aethereal layer that is affecting the relationship.

A More Complex Example

Let’s say we want to convert 17 * 19 = 323 to Qualimath. This will create 3 states in our sandbox:

• State 1 for 17
• Pseudo-state or action for 19
• State 2 for the answer

We notate this as (State 1 * action) :: State 2, deconstructed as (17 * 19) :: answer

We use Egyptian Math, as Al-Khwarizmis algorithms, to deconstruct 17 (State 1) into its doubles as a ratio of the doubles of 19 (action).

We use State 1 as the focus and add the corresponding values in the action* to get State 2 as 323**.

Here, the smaller number is put before the larger. In case of multiple multipliers, the first 2 are combined then rearranged, then multiplied with the latter multipliers.

This use of states, foci, and arrangements greatly simplifies math instead of making it boring and burdensome.