Acarya Shri Hari Shamkarji says Baba is a Liar

[Published in Prajina Bharati July 1984]

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Dear Shri Editor,

I have gone through the letters to the Editor’ column published in your esteemed magazine, Prajina Bharati, for February, 1984.

Regarding the Ananda Katha series, so far it had only been the question of hurting the sentiments of my fellow Margii brothers.

But now, Acarya Shri Hari Shamkarji has outright doubted the truthfulness of the facts in Ananda Katha.

He says that the prime question is of recording satya for the benefit of posterity.

He believes that Baba’s statement about Himself as Shri Ram Chandra Upadhyayaji is not satya. And so he has the full privilege of treating the whole of Ananda Katha as asatya (not satya).

However, how can it be partly satya and partly asatya?

If what Baba has said is not satya, then what else is satya?

Acarya Shri Hari Shankarji should tell us what is the satya.

Is it not a fact that we address Shrii Shrii Anandamurtiji, who is Taraka Brahma, Mahasambhuti and Mahakaul expressed in the form of Prabhat Rainjan, as Baba?

Is it at all possible to separate Shrii Shrii Anandamurtiji from the present form of Prabhat Rainjan?

We know Shrii Shrii Anandamurtiji only through the present from of Shrii Shrii Prabhat Rainjanji. So any controversy becomes meaningless.

I think there are only 3 alternatives:

1. He should ask Baba Himself and settle the issue for good

2. If he can believe the major portion of Ananda Katha to be Satya, he must also believe that the portion in goes from is equally Satya.

3. If thinks that portion of Ananda Katha as outright untrue and false, he should forbid me from producing it any further.

In paragraph 2 of his letter, Acaryaji Hari Shankar has defined the Taraka Brahma as He who takes human form after assigning a role for Himself.

I never differ with him. But it is completely the prerogative and supreme wish of he Taraka Brahma for choosing the human form to express himself on earth.

His reason for choosing a particular human form cannot be questioned or challenged. His reasons are beyond the limits and capabilities of our quite limited and small human minds.

Yours very truly Sd. Nagina