Socialist and Communist Literature

1. Reactionary Socialism

A. Feudal Socialism

The French and English aristocracies wrote pamphlets against modern capitalist society. They fell to capitalism in the:

• French Revolution of July 1830, and
• the English reform agitation[A]

This ended any hope of serious political struggle. Only a literary battle remained possible.

In order to arouse sympathy, the aristocracy sided with the people.

This led to feudal Socialism: half lamentation, half lampoon. It struck ineffectively against capitalists.

This was done by:

• one section of the French Legitimists
• “Young England”

They pointed out that their mode of exploitation was different from that of the capitalists.

The feudalists forgot that they exploited people under circumstances that were quite different and that are now antiquated.

They showed that the modern proletariat never existed under their rule.

• They forgot that the modern capitalist is the necessary offspring of their own form of society.

Their chief accusation against the capitalist is that the capitalist régime creates a revolutionary proletariat class which will cut up root and branch of the old order of society.

• They upbraid the capitalists for creating such a class.

In political practice, therefore, they join all coercive measures against the working class.

In ordinary life, they:

• stoop to pick up the golden apples dropped from the tree of industry
• barter truth, love, and honour, for traffic in wool, beetroot-sugar, and potato spirits.(2)

As the parson has ever gone hand in hand with the landlord, so has Clerical Socialism with Feudal Socialism.

It is easy to give Christian asceticism a Socialist tinge.

Has not Christianity declaimed against private property, against marriage, against the State?

Has it not preached in the place of these, charity and poverty, celibacy and mortification of the flesh, monastic life and Mother Church?

Christian Socialism is but the holy water with which the priest consecrates the heart-burnings of the aristocrat.

B. Sismondi’s Petty-Capitalist Socialism

The medieval burgesses and the small peasant proprietors were the precursors of the modern capitalists.

In undeveloped countries, these 2 classes still vegetate side by side with the rising capitalists.

In developed countries, these led to the Petty-Capitalist, a supplementary part of capitalist society

• These fluctuate between proletariat and capitalists, and are ruined by the real capitalists.

In countries like France, peasants make up far more than half of the population.

• It was natural for pro-proletariat writers to use the flag of the peasant and the petty-capitalist

This led to petty-capitalist Socialism.

Sismondi was the head of this school in France and in England.

• It dissected with great acuteness the contradictions in the conditions of modern production.
• It laid bare the hypocritical apologies of economists.

It proved:

• the disastrous effects of machinery and division of labour
• the concentration of capital and land in a few hands
• overproduction and crises

It pointed out:

• the inevitable ruin of the petty capitalist and peasant
• the misery of the proletariat
• the anarchy in production
• the crying inequalities in the distribution of wealth
• the industrial war of extermination between nations
• the dissolution of old moral bonds of the old family relations and the old nationalities.

In aims, however, either to:

• restore the old means of production and exchange, and with them the old property relations and the old society, or
• cramp the modern means of production and exchange within the framework of the old property relations

In either case, it is both reactionary and Utopian.

Its last words are: “corporate guilds for manufacture; patriarchal relations in agriculture”.

Ultimately, when stubborn historical facts were removed of self-deception, this form of Socialism ended in a miserable fit of the blues.