Adam Smith's Doctrine on the Real Price of Corn
Table of Contents
What will Smith’s proposition lead to?
Let us assume that the real price of corn is unchangeable.*
Superphysics Note
It will follow that agriculture is immediately excluded from Smith’s principle which says that capital flows from one employment to another, according to the various and necessarily fluctuating wants of society.
It will follow, that the growth of corn:
- has, at all times, and in all countries, proceeded with a uniform unvarying pace, occasioned only by the equable increase of agricultural capital
- can never have been accelerated, or retarded, by variations of demand.
It will follow, that if a country were:
- overstocked with corn, capital would still not be withdrawn from agriculture
- understocked with corn, capital would not be added to agriculture in order to restore the balance
But these consequences, which would incontestably follow from the
Smith’s doctrine, that the price of corn immediately and entirely regulates the prices of labour and of all other commodities, is so directly contrary to all experience.
- It itself cannot possibly be true.*
Superphysics Note
Whatever influence the price of corn may have on other commodities, it is neither so immediate nor so complete, as to make this kind of produce an exception to all others.
Smith implies that no such exception exists with regard to corn.
Superphysics Note
In consequence, he does not shift the question from the exchangeable value of corn to its physical properties. And so he:
- speaks with an unusual lack of precision
- qualifies his positions by the expressions much, and in any considerable degree.
Superphysics Note
The rise of price caused by a bounty, on its first establishment, is nominal and not real.
A rise of corn prices caused by an export bounty or a ban on corn importation cannot be less real than a rise of price caused by:
- bad seasons
- population increase
- the rapid progress of commercial wealth, or
- any other natural cause
Dr Smith’s argument, with its qualifications, be valid for the purpose for which it is advanced, it applies equally to an increased price occasioned by a natural demand.
Let us suppose that an unusually prosperous foreign commerce leads to:
- an increase in corn demand
- an increase in the price of corn
According to the principles of supply and demand, and the general principles of the Wealth of nations, such an increase in the price of corn would give a decided stimulus to agriculture.
More capital would be laid out on the land. This actually happened in Britain during the last 20 years.
But according to the specific principle of Smith on the real price of corn, however, agriculture would get no such stimulus because the price of labor and commodities would go up immediately.
The farmer and landlord might have gotten 75 shillings a quarter for their corn instead of 60.
- Yet the farmer would not have been enabled to cultivate better, nor the landlord to live better.
Thus it would appear that:
- agriculture is exempt from this principle which distributes the capital of a nation according to the varying profits of stock in different employments
- no increase of price can, at any time or in any country, materially accelerate the growth of corn, or determine a greater quantity of capital to agriculture.*
Superphysics Note
The actual facts contradict this reasoning.
Smith was led into this train of argument, from his habit of considering labour as the standard measure of value, and corn as the measure of labour.
But, that corn is a very inaccurate measure of labour as proven by the history of our own country.
Labour, compared with corn, has experienced very great and striking variations, from year to year, but from century to century and for ten, twenty, and thirty years together.
One of the most incontrovertible doctrines of political economy is that neither labour nor any other commodity can be an accurate measure of real value in exchange*.
Superphysics Note
Making corn regulate the prices of all commodities is to erect it as a standard measure of real value in exchange.
If so then we must either:
- deny the truth of Dr Smith’s argument, or
- acknowledge that a given quantity of corn will at all times and in all countries, purchase the same quantity of labour and of the necessaries and conveniences of life.*