An armed Loadstone does not endow an excited piece of Iron with greater vigour than an unarmed
Table of Contents
Suppose there are two pieces of iron.
One has been excited by an armed loadstone.
The other by one unarmed.
Apply to one of them another piece of iron of a weight just proportional to its strength.
The remaining one in like manner raises the same and no more.
Magnetick versoria also touched by an armed loadstone turn with the same velocity and constancy towards the poles of the earth as those magnetized by the same loadstone unarmed.
Chapter 19: Union with an armed Loadstone is stronger hence greater weights are raised but the coition is weaker
An armed magnet raises a greater weight, as is manifest to all; but a piece of iron moves towards a stone at an equal, or rather greater, distance when it is bare, without an iron cap.
This must be tried with two pieces of iron of the same weight and figure at an equal distance, or with one and the same versorium, the test being made first with an armed, then with an unarmed loadstone, at equal distances.
Chapter 20: An armed Loadstone raises an armed Loadstone, which also attracts a third though the virtue in the first is small
Magnets armed cohære firmly when duly joined, and accord into one
Though the first be rather weak, yet the second one adhæres to it not only by the strength of the first, but of the second, which mutually give helping hands; also to the second a third often adheres and in the case of robust stones, a fourth to the third.
Chapter 21:
If Paper or any other Medium be interposed, an armed loadstone raises no more than an unarmed one.
Observation has shown above that an armed loadstone does not attract at a greater distance than an unarmed one; yet raises iron in greater quantity, if it is joined to and made continuous with the iron. But if Paper be placed between, that intimate cohæsion of the metal is hindered, nor are the metals cemented together at the same time by the operation of the magnet.