June 19, 1982
When a negative distortion is effected, this calling occurs.
In addition, the light of which we have spoken, emanating from attempts to be of service to others in a fairly clear and lucid sense, is another type of calling in that it represents that which requires balance by temptation.
There have been certain avenues into the mind/body/spirit complexes of this group which have been made available by your fifth-density friend.
In the mechanism of the calling the movement is as you would expect; that is, the entities are within your planetary influence and are, having come through the quarantine web, free to answer such calling.
The temptations are offered by those negative entities of what you would call your inner planes.
These dark angels have been impressed by the service-to-self path offered by those which have come through quarantine from days of old and these entities, much like your angelic presences of the positive nature, are ready to move in thought within the inner planes of this planetary influence working from time/space to space/time.
The mechanism of the 5th Density entity is from density to density and is magical in nature.
4th Density, of itself, cannot build the highway into the energy web. However, it can use that which has been left intact.
These entities are the Orion entities of 4th Density.
The description must be bated under the Law of Confusion.
The cause for a variety of physical vehicles is the remaining variety of heritages from 2D physical vehicular forms.
Physical evolution continues to hold sway into 4th Density.
Only when the ways of wisdom have begun to refine the power of what you may loosely call thought is the form of the physical complex manifestation more nearly under the direction of the consciousness.
Well, If the population of this planet presently looks similar to the fifth-density entities I was wondering why this is?
Evolution would normally be 3D resembling that its 2D version and then refining in 4th Density then 5th Density, becoming what the population of this planet looks like on 3D.
Why is Earth ahead of itself in the way the mind/body/spirit complex, or body complex of that, looks?
Your query is based upon a misconception.
In 5th Density the physical complex is more and more under the control of the conscious mind complex.
Therefore, the 5th Density entity may dissolve one manifestation and create another.
Consequently, the choice of a 5th Density entity or complex of entities wishing to communicate with your peoples would choose to resemble your peoples’ physical-complex, chemical, yellow-ray vehicles.
This is so. There is a great theoretical distance between demanding that the creatures of an infinite creation be unnoticeably similar to oneself and observing those signs which may be called human which denote the third density characteristics of self-consciousness.
The grouping into pairs, societal groups, and races. The further characteristic means of using self-consciousness to refine and search for the meaning of the milieu.
Well, within Ra’s knowledge of 3rd density physical forms, what percentage would be similar enough to this planet’s physical form that we would assume the entity to be human even though they were a bit different?
This would have to be very rough because of my definition being very rough.
This percentage is still small; perhaps 13-15% due to the capabilities of various 2nd density life forms to carry out each necessary function for third density work.
Thusly to be observed would be behavior indicating self-consciousness and purposeful interaction with a sentient ambiance about the entity rather than those characteristics which familiarly connote to your peoples the humanity of your third density form.
I am trying to link to the creation of various Logos and their original use of a system of archetypes in their creation.
For our Logos in the beginning, prior to its creation of 1st density, did the archetypical system which it had chosen for its creations include the 3rd density human form, or was this related to the archetypical concept at all?
We are not entirely sure why our Logos and several neighboring Logoi of approximately the same space/time of flowering chose the bipedal, erect form of the 2nd density apes to invest.
We suppose that:
- our Logos was interested in further intensifying the veiling process by offering to the 3rd density form the near complete probability for the development of speech taking complete precedence over concept communication or telepathy.
- the opposable thumb was looked on as an excellent means of intensifying the veiling process so that rather than rediscovering the powers of the mind the third density entity would, by the form of its physical manifestation, be drawn to the making, holding, and using of physical tools.
The archetypical mind is part of that mind which informs all experience.
The archetypical mind is the repository of those refinements to the cosmic or all-mind made by this particular Logos and peculiar only to this Logos.
Thus it may be seen as one of the roots of mind, not the deepest but certainly the most informative in some ways.
The other root of mind to be recalled is that racial or planetary mind which also informs the conceptualizations of each entity to some degree.
There are entities of Ra which have served as far Wanderers to those of another Logos.
The experience has been one which staggers the intellectual and intuitive capacities, for each Logos sets up an experiment enough at variance from all others that the subtleties of the archetypical mind of another Logos are most murky to the resonating mind, body, and spirit complexes of this Logos.
War is caused by Thumbs
Our Logos seems to have created many entities whose distortion was toward warfare, in that we had the Maldek and the Mars experience and now Earth.
It seems that Venus was the exception to that rule of warfare. Is this correct and was this envisioned and planned into the construction of the archetypical mind, possibly not with respect particularly to warfare as we have experienced it but to the extreme action to polarization in consciousness?
The Logos designed Its experiment to achieve the greatest polarization in third density. It is incorrect that warfare of the types specific to your experiences was planned by the Logos.
Hhostility is an interesting result which is apparently concomitant with the tool-making ability. The choice of the Logos to use the life-form with the grasping thumb is the decision to which this type of warfare may be traced.
That which you say is correct upon its own merits, but is not a repetition of our statement.
Our suggestion was that within the experiential nexus of each entity within its 2nd density environment and within the roots of mind there were placed biases indicating to the watchful eye the more efficient of the two paths. Let us say, for want of a more precise adjective, that this Logos has a bias towards kindness.
No. There have been Logoi with greater percentages of negative harvests.
However, the biasing mechanisms cannot change the requirements for achieving harvestability either in the positive or in the negative sense. There are Logoi which have offered a neutral background against which to polarize.
This Logos chose not to do so but instead to allow more of the love and light of the Infinite Creator to be both inwardly and outwardly visible and available to the sensations and conceptualizations of mind/body/spirit complexes undergoing Its care in experimenting.
Then as I see the plan for the evolution by this Logos it was planned to create as vivid an experience as possible but also one which was somewhat informed with respect to the Infinite Creator and able to accelerate progress as a function of will because of the permeabilities of densities.
Have I covered accurately the general plan of this Logos with respect to Its evolution?
Cconsider that the archetypical mind is a part of the deep mind. There are several portions to this mind. The mind may serve as a resource. To call the archetypical mind the foundation of experience is to oversimplify the activities of the mind/body/spirit complex.
To work with your query as to percentages is, therefore, enough misleading in any form of direct answer that we would ask that you re-question.
That’s OK. I don’t think that was that good a question anyway.
Now, when Ra initially planned for helping the Egyptians with their evolution, what was the most, or the primary concept, and also secondary and tertiary if you can name those, that Ra wished to impart to the Egyptians? In other words, what was Ra’s training plan or schedule for making the Egyptians aware of what was necessary for their evolution?
We came to your peoples to enunciate the Law of One. We wished to impress upon those who wished to learn of unity that in unity all paradoxes are resolved:
- all that is broken is healed
- all that is forgotten is brought to light
We had no teaching plan. Our intention was to manifest that which was requested by those learn/teachers to which we had come.
We are aware that this particular line of querying; that is, the nature and architecture of the archetypical mind, has caused the questioner to attempt, to its own mind unsuccessfully, to determine the relative importance of these concepts. We cannot learn/teach for any, nor would we take this opportunity from the questioner.
The adept has already worked much, not only within the red, orange, yellow, and green energy centers, but already in the opening of blue and indigo. Up through this point the archetypes function as the great base or plinth of a builded structure or statue keeping the mind complex viable, level, and available as a resource whenever it may be evoked.
There is a point at which the adept takes up its work. This is the point at which a clear and conscious consideration of the archetypical mind is useful.
Leave a Comment
Thank you for your comment!
It will appear after review.
