Fear of Failure

Addressing Fear of Failure and Agitation

Asker: Does it exist within you that you yourself are not calm?

Bashar: Oh, I’m not calm.

Asker: Are you saying that you would prefer to be calm? Are you now telling us that you think that the only way you will be is to contact this person? That’s difficult.

No, I don’t think so. I don’t think it will ever end. I just think that’s something that has to—that I have to change, that nobody else can.

When will you do that? There’s that process.

Well, I’ll ask you this. I assume first of all that when you say you’re not calm, you mean this in a negative way. All right.

So, what do you get out of being agitated? How does it serve you to be agitated?

Because obviously, based on another discussion we recently had a few moments ago, if this is what you’re choosing to be, you must obviously believe that somehow it serves you to be agitated. So, what do you get out of being agitated?

I don’t. That’s why I want to be at home.

No, no, no. Listen closely. Listen closely. You’re not getting it. No. None of you lack motivation.

The thing that you are doing, the way that you are being, you are being because you’re motivated to be that way. So don’t say I get nothing out of it. If that were really true, you would not be agitated. Do you understand? You are choosing to be agitated. So what does being agitated give you as an advantage?

Sometimes people on your planet understand the question more clearly when I ask it this way. What does being agitated give you permission or an excuse not to have to do?

Does that make the question clearer?

What does being agitated keep you occupied and focused on that you otherwise then would have time to do something else? Go in another direction.

Or I’ll ask it this way. If you could choose to be calm, what would that mean in the quality of your life and how different it would be?

More positive thinking for myself.

Just positive thinking and actually doing things that I want to do.

And what prevents you from doing those positive things now?

Being agitated.

Yes. And what do you think would be the consequence of doing those positive things that scares you so much you don’t want to choose to do them?

Trying to find this person to contact this person to understand my—

No, no, no, no, no, no, no. Forget that person for now. Okay, we’re talking about you.

What is it about choosing to do the things you say you would rather do and being the way you say you would rather be that scares you so much?

Failure. All right. All right. And then feeling like you would fail. Yes. All right.

Now meditation. Are you ready to receive this? This will help you.

Now think of the idea in your life of reaching out to do a particular thing that you want to do and imagine—see yourself not accomplishing.

Now say these sacred words. So what? I can still do what I want to do. Because it’s not necessarily about doing that thing as much as it is about being who I am. Understand?

Let the charge go. Understand? Let the charge go.

You are you. You are unique. You are successful already.

Because why? Because the only thing you have to be is you. However you do anything, all you have to do is do it as yourself. And you have succeeded.

So let me point out this amazing paradoxical irony to you. Not that anything is really a failure, but I’m just going to use your words to illustrate the point.

By not being yourself, no matter what the consequence, you are failing already. So seems so bad.

So actually being yourself by doing what you want to do no matter what the outcome would actually be more successful than what you’re already doing because what you’re doing now is not being yourself. And if anything can be called a failure, that’s it.

So you’re already a failure. How about that?

No fun. Correct.

Discussion on Oversouls and Counterparts

Asler: to what you are familiar with when you talk about third density. All right. And then early on they they progress to four and so on. Yes. For in your terms several thousand years it has been that way. All right.

And the levels of—Yes. like we we commonly talk about having conversations with you. Yes. uh like and I noticed that if you can’t uh it’s relatively arbitrary since a split can be made anywhere anywhere along the line. Yes.

What I’m trying to get hold of say like you figure that my physical body I’m one of one soul. Okay. All right. And uh what would the number of souls be that’s connected to me to the next level? You know what I’m saying? It is not clear. Can you be more specific in what way you are interpreting this concept?

Well, a one-on-one concept of uh the individual having one thought. Yes. Figuring the counterpart to that individual concurrent in your time frame. Concurrent or past future. All right. Right. But typically past and future are not called counterparts in the classical use of that term. Yes. Essentially. Yes. Essentially count.

But now it says the next now what I’m saying is if you go up and and that’s just the next level. Yes. All right. Do you mean the oversoul itself or the higher self? Yes. The oversoul itself. All right. Yes. To which all those counterparts connect. That’s right. Yes.

Now, how many of those counterparts did you create? There are how many counterparts in one particular space-time reality connect into an oversoul? Yeah, but can be dozens. It can be thousands. It can be tens of thousands. It depends upon exactly what that oversoul is experiencing.

Oh, it’s not sad at all. Depends on what the purpose of the suggestions are. Absolutely. Because an oversoul may decide that it needs to experience things in so many different dimensions of reality that it splits itself or projects itself into multi-millions of counterparts. Or it may simply say one’s enough to achieve that further. Yes. In one particular linear dimension of reality perspective.

Sexuality and Spiritual Connection

Sexuality yes connected to all these parts. All right. I have come across some material that that I talk about uh just a sexual acting seed orgasm and all. Yes. When you do that, yeah, you’re using the uh energy upload in some senses, but you are also of course using the electromagnetic energy of your physiological reality. Yes, I understand that. But what I’m trying to uh figure out Yes. is it implies that not necessarily except within whatever parameters may have been set up for that particular counterpart experience. There may be a window of opportunity to experience a certain level of connection to the oversoul with regard to certain kinds of things that you may choose to do in any given life that may have a beginning and an ending time frame to it or if you wish an expiration date based on the idea that that particular soul has decided to experience. But that doesn’t mean it’s an empirical absolute that that’s so that’s simply something that is decided in the agenda as to how that will be experienced. Oh, okay. Because uh I was thinking of limitation of course for well no not really because you are an unlimited being ultimately and there is no limit to the infinite of course to which every oversoul is connected. All right then other sources have talked about like more like whatever but they are making specific references to certain conditions.

The Nature of the Spirit State

Uh, now you talked about like the uh spirit state being like a total. Well, in a sense, you know, we can’t even fathom the ecstasy of it. To some degree, you can have those kundalini moments at least closely in your physiological reality. But yes, there is a state in spirituality which can in some senses be said to be analogous to a constant orgasm. Yes. Although of course the translation is not direct since it isn’t physical. Yes, I understand. Yes. And when when achieving orgasm Yes. in the physical state. Yes. You cause an alignment to happen along all those channels all the way up and down the spectrum in all the different bodies that you have. Yes. And at that moment that’s like the real point in a sense. Yes. It is like a direct tap back into the infinite. Okay. And uh it’s like lining up all the avenues. You understand? Yeah. All the all the Yes. Is there any way we can maintain that? You mean and still hold a job? Well, of course, in a sense, you can retain always what might be classically called the residual effect. It isn’t always to your benefit to maintain the actual state because then there’s no purpose of application. If it were that you wanted to absolutely maintain it, you would simply translate to a level where that was more appropriately expressed in that particular format. But yes, you can, as you say, not so much maintain it, but allow it to permeate everything you do in the very act of always acting in your excitement. Yes. You can always feel orgasmic in everything that you do in a physical applicative way. Yes. And that would keep the alignment. Oh, absolutely. Which would which would uh you know, from what I’m getting at if you achieve that state and you’re in a state of disease. Yes. All right. You would be in a state of hell.

The Three Cones

And you could be Yes. I repeat, do you mean for the code? Yes. I didn’t have time to write. Oh, right. The first cone is based on the idea of the Fibonacci sequence of structure. This results in a cone with an apex angle of 33.9°. The second cone is a cone that is representative of an apex angle of 19.5°. And in terms of the relationship of its height to its base, you will find that it will be created to be 33 and a3 units high and 33 and a3 units around the circumference. Whatever you desire the unit to be as long as it is both 33 and a3, not diameter, circumference and height. The third is representative of what you call the great pyramid of Giza in its exact proportions of being height to base the phi ratio of 1 to 1.618 which is the natural ratio of all growing things and the exact translation of a into physical. This gives a triangle automatically of 51° at each lower base angle and 78° at the apex. Whether it is a cone or a four-sided pyramid is the same. Does that help you? I don’t think I I got that all yet. 33.9° apex angle number one. 19.5° apex angle number two. 78° apex angle number three. base height to base is the phi ratio 1 to 1.618. and to you. Good day.

Human Evolution and Genetic Manipulation

Asker: Approximately 500,000 years ago said that home fire was that opportunity given to them by the natural in terms of the original genetic manipulations that created out of the native hominid species. the move toward what you call homo sapiens and in that sense you could say it was artificially produced as an ability to then discover that for themselves you understand that so they came upon it as a result of the genetic enhancement that ultimately led to their capability to see things in that way and the evolve originally had much larger nasal passages for oxygenation.

Why was that?

There are a different reasons. Some of them environmental, some of them the result of the limitations imposed upon the selves of the collective consciousness in that if you pretend that you are not using it then you do not need to manifest as much. You understand that also there were the results of certain genetic manipulations that were deemed to be both a refinements of concentration and b also the weeding out of certain things that in certain strains were deemed to be undesirable from their political point of view. of the oxygen intake would actually create more of a focus to some degree. To some degree, yes. Also in that it was recognized that that there would be less oxygen on the planet in the changes. It was redesigned to take advantage of that idea whereas in the past there was more. Now this would seem to be contradictory in the sense of saying why not reduce something because if there’s more oxygen you don’t need as much. But it doesn’t work this way. You have to design a thing to be shaped for the environment itself. Otherwise, it is not the vibration of that environment in direct reflection.

That was one of the limitations that in that sense it is neither the idea of limitation or otherwise. It was simply the material that was at hand to work with. So the big eyes represent They represent what they represent in the archetypal expression left in what you would call the simian animal in you. They represent what they represent in the archetypal representation of the human and both of you see things differently is any animal will see differently than you do because of its archetypal representation or symbolic place within the collective consciousness. It is not an issue of taking anything away from you. It is an issue of simply that you need to be what you are designed to be.

DNA was initial many different forms of what you would call dinosauria. There were some strains more than others such as what you would call the troodons and some of what you would call the raptors and so forth. But it is also a blend and a mixture over many different generations of experimentation.

Frequency of Certain Entities

What frequency do? They do not actually vibrate at a frequency that is congruent with your reality. So to give you a frequency would not be a one-to-one correlation. If they were to project into your reality, I could give you a correlation, but it doesn’t necessarily extrapolate directly or relate directly to the frequency scale we often use to represent your frequency. Are they mostly autonomous or are they mostly It is an odd and unusual combination of the two. You cannot really say mostly. It is too blended to separate those concepts apart from one another in their society. They are autonomous and they are in many ways servile. It’s their nature in that sense. Yet they are autonomous within it. Yet they are designed in a certain fashion. their vibration relative to your reality would be somewhere between 11,000 and 37,000 cycles per second. But again, remember that is not a direct relationship to the frequencies that we often give you. It is calculated in a very different way that we will explain at a future date.

Technological Frequencies

Number six. The idea is that it is based upon the vibration itself of atomic structures and crystalline structures that are the basis vibrationally for all things you would understand to be technological in nature as an expression in your reality. in a sense that is a simplistic way of saying it. We can also get into that in more detail at another time.

Saturn and Melancholy

Saturn is known as the god of melancholy and took on a negative connotation in our council. Yes. What brought on? Simply forgetfulness and misinterpretation of the idea of what might pass for melancholy, but in fact is simply calm wisdom, calm knowing.

Closing Remarks

We will then once again extend to each and every one of you our deep appreciation and allowing our civilization to communicate with your civilization in this way at this time. Our unconditional love to each and every one of you individually and collectively. And we remind you once again. It is up to you. But by all means, live your dream instead of simply dreaming about being alive.

Final Reflections on Freedom and Being Yourself

Because you see when you worry about the consequences of doing what you want to do then you are putting limiting conditions conditionality on your love on your creativity. You are saying that if I don’t do this then I am a failure because doing this is better than not getting it. You’re judging, judging, judging, judging, judging everything you do because you’re making a comparison that it’s supposed to come out a particular way in order for you to gauge that it’s somehow successful. If you do it, no matter what the outcome, if you do it as yourself, it’s already succeeded because that’s the only thing you have to do to be yourself. It’s the only thing you have to do.

Can you stand to be that free? Can you all stand to know that you are actually that free? So free that you really don’t have to do anything but be yourself.

Oh no. Now what am I going to do with my day? I am so used to spending so much time fighting my natural self. It occupies so much of my day that if I stop doing that, I’ll have nothing to do. That’s my fear.

You are suffering from the concept called perfection syndrome in which you have defined the concept of being your perfect self as being boring. You understand? Believe me, you’re not boring and neither will your reality be.

The question that remains is only this. Can you handle that much ecstasy?

Then stop equating success and failure to what it is you are capable of manifesting out there because there is no out there. Nothing. Nothing.

It’s all right here. It’s just you. Being you. However you say being you is being you.

Stop thinking in terms of results and just understand that all you need to do is be you in everything you do. And it will automatically automatically fill your life with what needs to be there.

Because by being you, you can only get the reflection of the things that are representative of you. The true you, the real you, the ecstatic you, the unconditionally loving you, the creative you, the buoyant you, the jubilant you.

Final Guidance on Letting Go and Trusting

So, well, your people coin many different things. We finally can do that.

So, so let go of the other person for now. Let go.

Be the essence of calmness because that’s who you want to be. Calm binds calm. Like attracts like.

How is a person in agitation going to truly be able to connect with a person of calmness? Yes, sometimes you may fool yourself into thinking that you have just because they run across your path. But that doesn’t mean that a real relationship or a real connection is happening just because you may observe that they exist.

You can be right next to a person. You can live with a person for years and never connect.

So until you allow yourself to know calmness first, any true connection with a truly calm person is impossible for you.

But when you are calm, everything comes. You are automatically in the right place at the right time because you’re not agitated and in a hurry to get somewhere you think you need to be, which in fact is the only sure way of being where you’re not supposed to be. You understand?

You cannot miss. You cannot miss by definition a date with destiny.

So relax. Relax. I mean, that’s up to you. But listen to the completion of this statement. You cannot miss a date with destiny except by worrying that you will miss it. You understand?

So relax. Relax and follow your intuition, your imagination, your excitement. The thing that excites you the most is going to place you where you need to be when you need to be there.

Stop analyzing the way the opportunities look. You could be excited about doing something that seems completely, absolutely, and totally on the surface unconnected to the idea of running across that person.

But I guarantee you, if you simply follow your joy and you really are supposed to connect with that person, that unexpected route is what’s going to get you there quicker. You understand? Yeah.

Life Changes and Following Joy

Asker: I am recently using the astrological model. I’ve been I’ve been able to see in that using that model that this thing is virtually upon me now. I think it just kicked in recently. All right. And but really going to kick in at full speed right around my birthday next month.

Oh. All right. Happy birthday. Thank you. What better gift to give yourself than kicking yourself in? But did that translate strangely? Strangely unexpected. Oh, thank you.

What I wanted to ask you with reference to that was—Yes. Uh, is there anything that you could tell me that I—Are you asking me to unwrap your birthday presents for you? No. No. Then what do I need to tell you?

Uh if there is something that I could or should be doing to or can be doing. Yeah. To better position myself either physically, mentally, psychologically or in any other way for what I see as now just at the at the at the beginning of this large—I don’t know what to call it—adventure for lack of anything else that I that I don’t know of. I know there are some things I should be doing such such acts.

Well, what do you deem that you could be doing that you think would be more in alignment with that state?

Uh, using using techniques of of mental concentration. So, does that excite you? Yes, it does. Oh, all right. Then, by all means, do it.

I—It’s in my intention to do it, and I haven’t done it, and that’s my problem for some reason. Been putting it off.

Oh, all right. Why? I thought you said it was exciting. It is exciting, and I don’t know why.

Um, well, again, what’s your motivation? for what you’re choosing. What’s your motivation? You mean my motivation to not doing the thing that I really—Yes. Because you’re not in a sense motivated to not do. You are motivated to do something else.

Remember, none of you lack motivation. So, it’s not that you lack the motivation to do it. It’s just that all your motivation is going toward something else. What is it? It’s not just not doing that. It’s another thing undo itself that you’re doing that you’re motivated to do. What is it instead?

I don’t know. I don’t know that I’m doing anything in a positive sense to replace or supersede this this that I should be doing. It’s just uh I’m living in a very mundane sort of way. Mundane. Define mundane. Work. taking care of day-to-day necessities and basically work and sleep at the moment. Are you trying to get information as much as I can?

All right. Well, are you also then suggesting that you cannot be doing something more exciting in the sense that you don’t believe that something more exciting will support your daily need? No. You are not suggesting that? No, because I don’t think there’s a contradiction.

Are you doing for your daily needs what excites you the most? No, I’m doing what seems to be necessary. Seems to be necessary based on what criteria? Physical survival. So again, you are saying that you have to do something you don’t enjoy for physical survival.

That’s very true. Well, it’s not true. It’s your belief. I’m agreeing with you that I’m saying that. Yes. Well, why are you saying that? If that’s not what you prefer, why don’t you believe that you can do something you would prefer to do that would sustain your physical survival? Why don’t you believe that that’s possible?

I—It’s not that I don’t believe—Oh, yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. It’s that I don’t see how to make the transition from where I am to that.

Oh, it’s very very simple. It’s very simple. And again, yes, it is that you don’t see that it’s possible because if you did see it, you’d be doing it. So there is no transition to make except making a choice.

Is there something you would rather be doing? If you could choose to do anything and knew that it could support you, what would you choose to do instead of what you’re doing? Name something.

Oh, network. uh take part in a network the same thing that I mentioned the last time that we had this discussion. network with people who were uh involved in some issues that I care very strongly about.

Well, have you taken any steps in that direction? Yes, I have. Would you like to take more? Yes, and I intend to. I’m going to.

When when you get so sick and tired of doing something to support yourself that you don’t like that you will finally stop doing it. Is that how long you want to wait? It’s up to you.

Oh no, no. I had no no plan at all to wait in the kind of time like that. But you are waiting now. You are saying right now that you’re waiting because you are still doing something that you really don’t prefer to do in order to, as you say, make ends meet because you don’t believe that doing what you would really love to do would help you make ends meet.

So, you’re waiting right now. How long will you wait? How much longer will you wait to start doing the thing you say you really would love to do? How much longer will it take for you to believe that that can support you?

I don’t know. Well, I guess when it does when I take the steps that I’m comfortable taking—and you mean when you believe it. Yes.

Well, then the pace is up to you completely. There’s nothing else I can help you with. Your pace is in your hand completely. But that’s the clarity of the situation.

You don’t believe the thing you love to do can support you. You believe you need to do something that you don’t love to do in order to be supported. That’s it. Everything else now is in your hands to make the determination as to when you believe, when you will trust the positive instead of the negative.

Because again, it’s not a lack of trust. It’s not that you don’t trust yourself. It’s that you are trusting that you need to do the thing you don’t want to do in order to be supported more than you trust that you can do the thing you would love to do and be supported.

So, it’s not an issue of not trusting. It’s an issue of where your trust is focused. You have to change the focus of your trust. But only you can decide when you will be comfortable believing that. You could do it instantaneously right here, right now in the next second. Or you could take oh, I don’t know, 30 years. But it’s up to you.

You have to decide when enough is enough. Don’t you? So sure, nobody else. for your birthday.

What I would recommend to you then is to sit calmly, quietly in what you consider to be a beautiful location of peace and serenity and support and joy and let this idea run its course through you.

Ponder this. Ponder this one single choice that you can make and see if you can get any insight and any clarity on how soon you can allow yourself to be supported by the thing you love.

Give that to yourself as a birthday present. You will have help in this. I guarantee it if you ask for it. You will have hope in this on that day when you sit and ponder this. You will not be alone.

You will be given suggestions for hints, wisps, clues, insights, inspirations, pictures, ideas, words. Listen to them all. Absorb them all and then integrate and choose what seems truest for you and trust it without expectation.

Trust it without expectation. Trust it without expectation. Just act on your joy as fully as you can once you determine that that’s all right for you.

Question on Dr. Robert Beck’s Research

I’m looking for Dr. Robert Beck’s original paper on bio.

I’m having trouble working and maybe in the right direction. We will see what we can do. One moment. One moment. One moment. One moment. One moment. One moment. Just one moment. One moment. Begin by inquiring at what you call the University of Illinois and see where that leads you. If it’s if I appear the all the records 1300 articles of that I have given you the answer we have been given. Okay. begin your search at the University of Illinois area.

Radionics and Vibrational Healing

One other question concerning radionics. Can you give me any opinions or information?

If it is done with attention to the understanding of what vibration is all about and what kind of vibrations are being set up in the individual and are representative of the individual’s belief system structure, it can have great effect.

But it will depend upon the efficacy of the utilizer in terms of their understanding of what vibration is all about, resonance, identification and harmonics are all about and the degree of acceptability, acceptance and willingness on the part of the individual receiving such treatment.

Uh do you think uh like if you’re using equipment that any of the let’s say like coils or uh many of these things are not fully understood nor in a sense fashioned with all the precision that they could be.

Some individuals being highly intuitive will be able to move beyond the imprecisions in a sense and allow an effect to take place anyway. But many individuals in a sense do not understand it completely enough to really get the hang of it.

The idea however of the vibrational regimen that is understood in what you call typical homeopathic practices can act as a guideline for what is needed in terms of radionics. Yes. Yes.

Um now now as far as the homeopathy uh going along the other line just act the energy from the air such as Oregon which uh consider actually taking the devices that that accumulate uh this type of energy is also on the same track. Do you think that’s a plus or minus?

Again, it depends upon the application, but this is a little bit more in alignment with the idea of utilizing the natural electromagnetic field of your planet.

And one such device as we have described in recent times would be very beneficial for this depending upon its size, the material out of which it is constructed and its location and its application.

And that would be the shape called the cone. Specifically, three different ones we can give you.

Number one, the apex angle of a cone being 33.9°.

Number two, the apex angle of a cone being 19.5 degrees, representative of 33 and a3 units high and 33 and a3 units around its base circumference.

And the third being what you call the great pyramid in the sense that it is a 1 to 1.618 ratio of height to base, thus reflecting the phi ratio that acts as the etheric antenna to bring etheric energy down into physical manifestation depending upon how it is utilized and focused.

Material doesn’t matter. Material does matter. But different materials will have different effects. Size will have a different effect. Location will have a different effect. Application will have a different effect. Individuals involved will have a different effect.

But they are precise receiving translating transmuting antenna for etheric energy into physical materiality and manifestation.

That’s why they are in your remnant mythology the shape of the wizards and witches hats. You understand?

It is also why you have created what you call the dunce cap. For the idea is that it is supposed to make an individual smarter, more aligned. But you have forgotten the idea of its use, its precision in construction.

It is also the idea that you call the tower of babel and Jacob’s ladder. That is the cone. That is the etheric antenna of manifestation in precisely those dimensions as we have given them and also a few others.

But we will leave you with those three for now to play with.

Holographic Analogy of Reality

First of all, I’d like to thank you for asking us. All right. Do you find it of assistance? Very much so. All right.

Okay. Now I have a question. I was listening to the topic and during those you had offered an explanation by how past, present, and future lives exist. And on that as to how past, present and future exist simultaneously. All is one. All is now.

Do you understand the concept at all of what you call a hologram? What do you understand about that device or technology on your planet?

What is my—what do you understand a hologram to be? Do you understand how it is created? Do you understand what it is?

I keep seeing that little—the little ghost that is beside you with the connection. That is not a hologram, but it is. It is in a sense representative of the idea that is only the idea of playing with mirrors. It is not a hologram.

However, you are familiar with what you call little three-dimensional pictures that seem to be floating out of the frame. That is a hologram. You understand?

The construction of a hologram involves a certain kind of technology that allows or reveals a certain thing to be happening. And it is this.

If you will look at a hologram that is not illuminated, at the piece of plastic film that the photograph, the holographic photograph was taken upon. You will not see an image if it is not illuminated correctly. You will only see what might be ripples and patterns and lines almost like a very complex fingerprint. You understand?

This is representative of the information of the picture.

Now, the idea that you can see different angles appearing to be three-dimensional when you illuminate the hologram is representative of the fact that the information of all the angles of the object that was photographed is all in that one flat piece of plastic.

Were not all the angles represented by the information, you would see it only as a flat picture just like your typical two-dimensional photographs. Do you understand me so far?

All the information of all the angles that you could view the object from are in that flat two-dimensional piece of plastic. That’s why it looks three-dimensional because all the information is there.

But the only way you can see a different angle of the hologram is by viewing it from a different angle. You understand?

But are you not still looking at the same flat piece of plastic? So how is it that you see a side as opposed to a front? It’s because of the angle of illumination.

You are now only looking at the information that is relevant to depicting the side of the object as opposed to the information which is all there that is relevant to depicting the front of the object.

But you’re still looking at the same flat piece of plastic. But you’re only seeing the information of the side when you view it from the side and the information of the front when you view it from the front.

Physical reality is like that. Time and space are like that in construction. It is a similar analogy.

Everything, every bit of information of everything that exists is right here, right now. There is only one moment now. Only one moment. Time is your illusion.

What you call, if I might digress for a moment, what you call different moments one after another, what appears to be different moments one after another that you call the sequence of time, the continuity of time is all the same one moment viewed from different angles because there’s only one moment.

That one moment contains everything, but you don’t see everything at once because the angle of viewing from physical reality can only handle one angle at a time of that moment.

So when you stack all the different viewing angles in succession in your linear time frame, you get what you experience to be the sensation of time, past, present, future, but it’s all right here, right now.

Just as the whole image is in that flat piece of plastic all at once, but you only see this side when you look this way. You only see the front when you look this way. You only see the other side when you look this way. Just as you see the past when you look this way, you see the present when you look this way. You see the future when you look this way. But it’s all right here.

In the ultimate timesharing program, everything is in a sense, now this is just a colloquial euphemism, not literal, everything is, shall we say, taking turns, occupying the same space, but at different frequencies, so you don’t see it all at once.

Cone Material

Asker: I wanted to ask you about a cone. What would be the uh best material to make it out?

Depends upon what you want to do with it. What do you want to do with it?

As a hat. Yeah, in that sense you can make it out of a variety of things if it is simply for the purpose of allowing you to be under the influence of that shape as an apparel. The idea is that it can be cardboard, it can be stiffened cloth, it can be wood, it can be leather, it can even be metal if you wish. If you can make it light enough to comfortably wear on your head.

Book Recommendation and Counterparts

Asker: Thank you for suggesting a book Conversation with God. I want to ask you uh about the counterpart. But so to speak third density as fourth, yes, in its own way but in a parallel dimension not your third density not your fourth density its own third density fourth density transition.

Has he had interactions with any friends before from time to time to some degree? Yes. But none as direct or profound of course as with you, but has been present from time to time in interactions with other acquaintances of yours.

Right. and and uh in these interactions these uh in the presence of the reptilian also sometimes so then they have a working yes in a sense you could call it that right.

And uh how come we’ve never talked about the uh creating… Well, I’ve talked to you about creating this before and like steer me away from. So, is the wheel in your hand now? Would you like to steer back to… Yes. Go ahead.

Yes. What do you want to talk about in terms of Pleiadian counterpart? Pleiadian counterpart. Uh, current civilization. Do you have one? Yes. Is that what you’re asking? Yes, that’s what I’m asking in your concurrent time frame. Yes.

All right. Tangentially, I’ll explain it this way. You do not have a direct counterpart concurrently, but concurrently there is what would be considered to be a counterpart of the manifestation of your counterpart in a future time.

One moment we will attempt to clarify this. I hope so.

You understand that oversouls can split themselves into different levels of oversoul. Yes. Yes. All right.

So, look at it this way. The oversoul that is responsible for the creation of any and all Pleiadian counterparts that are connected to your oversoul as a human hasn’t created a counterpart concurrently but does create one or more than one in the future just to go in that direction for now.

But concurrently there is, shall we say, a cousin alive, a female Pleiadian that would in a sense be a relative, a relation, an ancestor of the one that will exist in the future, but that one is a part of the same oversoul of the one that will exist in the future. That will actually be more your direct counterpart. Yes.

Does that make sense to you now? Yes. More directly connected to my energy. Yes. So in a sense you could say that she is a quasi counterpart because it isn’t direct yet it is part of the same oversoul that will project the counterpart to you that is more direct.

So like a cousin in a sense to you and and that cousin counterpart that direct connected oversoul. Yes. Okay.

Does it have relations of the past society? Yes. All right. And uh what level were they at society? Well, how far back? Third dimensional. Well, they have been third density. Yes. At one time. Although in the time that they were what you would consider in their reality to be more fully ensconced in third density dimensionality. This was back when there was more the…