The Nature of Existence and Time
Many times when you search to understand the universe, you might ask: why does the universe exist?
What was before creation?
From our point of view, creation always was is now always will be time the concept of before and after are something that belong within creation and are subject to existence existence is not subject to time.
Therefore, what is simply always is and from your linear time frame referential point of view, always has been and always will be. Although the terms has been and will be are only symbolic reflections of another way to say that it simply always will be is in the now, always present. You are eternal since you are created from All-That-Is in a sense you have always been are now and always will be not necessarily the idea within a time frame reference of the particular fragment you call yourself now but the overall idea of your consciousness always exists. You are eternal since you are made out of eternity.
Why is there existence?
This can be answered.
But you may find that when you begin to involve yourself in forming a relationship to things that are dealing with what you call fundamental, the basic very generalized fundamental, the primary foundations of existence, then the answers will tend to become more and more and more simple. But it is not so much that there isn’t so to speak an answer to that question. Simply it is that the answer is so simple you have overlooked it because we do not think that that degree of simplicity represents anything real to you. Now we can give simply our point of view as to the idea of why existence exists to begin with. But we will share with you that we may recognize because we are to some degree familiar with the ideas you have created, the points of view have created, the way you look at things in your society, we might be able to let us say imagine that you may or may not find this to be in your eyes an oversimplification. But that will simply have to be the way it is if that is the case for you.
Therefore, you may recognize the idea like this. When you ask yourself the question, well, why does it exist? You are making an assumption that there is only one side to exist. In this way, you simply ask the question because you think that it was possible for everything to not have existed.
But recognize you are making the assumption that nonexistence is not something that is real. In this way, recognize that there is both existence and non-existence. They both occur at the same time, so to speak, to be colloquial in your language.
It is not necessarily a matter that the universe either could have existed or not existed. Both realities are present. There is existence and non-existence.
However, the reason you do not recognize the idea that both exist simultaneously side by side is that now you are dealing with a very fundamental foundational reference point itself. And when you deal on that level so to speak, what you are dealing with forms its own definitive reality. In other words, it defines itself.
Therefore, simply recognize it is not that existence and non-existence are not both real, but by definition, existence is the only thing that can exist. Nonexistence doesn’t exist. That does not mean it is not real. It simply means that by definition non-existence doesn’t exist. Therefore, it is not part of what you perceive to be as existence.
You cannot imagine nonexistence in your reality. The only definition that you have is your perception of your participation in existence because that is the only reality that allows you to have a perception.
Non-existence by definition does not allow there to be perception of itself. It is not that it is not real. It is not that it did not come into fruition quote unquote at the same time as existence. It is not that the universe could have gone one way or another to exist or to not exist. Both are real. They are the primary polarities in that way.
But on that level, they are only what their definition says they are. And since the definition of non-existence is that it does not exist, you cannot experience it. Therefore, you are simply experiencing the side that says you can experience it. That is all there is to it.
Questions
Nothing
Even nothing is something. You have no ability.
No one does has any ability to even conceive of nonexistence. If you were able to and then came back into existence, you’d never know. You had been gone. For you do not have the apparatus to know where it was, you weren’t. You follow me. Therefore, any concept that you find in your reality, no matter what definition you give it, no matter how it feels experientially perhaps to be like a void or like nothingness, it is still something and it is still a part of existence simply because you can define it. You can experience it. It is something to you. It has a label. You follow me?
The Cycle of the Universe and Entropy
But that—that—that does not recycle that way. Oh, it can. Many universes do. Your scientists have not yet realized the recycling of entropy.
People think that if the universe contracts, it will eventually become homogeneous. This is entropy. They usually refer to it as temperature.
Your sight is perceived—that all interactions are able to be interactions because they occur from or between states of being that are different. That is how you know there is an interaction: because something goes from something that is different to something that is different.
Your scientists think that the entropy in the universe after billions of years, everything will burn out, die out, no more atomic activity, no more interactions. Everything will become a homogeneous soup of energy all at the same level, all of the same temperature.
But they do not realize that the universe can still contract, because a state of complete and total homogeneousness means that so does space and time.
Once something reaches a state where you cannot tell if time is going forward or backward, then it could just as easily be conceived as going backward. As soon as it is equal to both forward or backward, it can become backward and the universe can reassemble itself.
So, it is like passing through an entropy doorway, a softer transition than many of your scientists believe, with the idea of there being more than enough gravity to simply draw all the material back, but a contraction nonetheless, a cycle nonetheless.
But all of those ideas of physiological cycle—whether you create your universe to be one that expands and contracts rhythmically in that way or goes through the entropy state—these ideas, as you count time, are in your terms many millions of years off.
In and out. It is simply like your radio. You are switching the dial back and forth across all the frequencies, hearing bits of this tune, bits of that voice here and there. You are simply generating a frequency at which you are doing this.
And the idea is that any one of those individual frequencies only considers itself to be real or solid for the time it is switched on, and does not perceive all of the other frequencies.
Not that it can’t, but it simply has designed itself only to pay attention to the frequency upon which it exists. Therefore, it has only considered itself to be real in that sense.
That does not mean all the other frequencies are not real, but they simply take turns experiencing their own individual reality.
Existence
No. What exists carries the idea of existence as what it is. In that way there is transformation within existence but all transformation takes place within the idea of existence.
What is is, by definition. What is not is not. But All-That-Is always will be. What is—you follow me?
By you. Yay. Oh, not necessarily.
For again, it simply may be a matter of the idea that you are creating your particular universe to be relatively limited in terms of its ability to conceive what does exist.
Now that may mean it does not have materialization within your particular idea of your universe, but that does not mean it does not exist within All-That-Is by definition.
In a sense, everything is transformation of All-That-Is into other states of All-That-Is. It is not exactly from non-existence.
It may be from nothing, but not from non-existence. Nothing may be referred to as some sort of homogeneous potential energy state that has no form.
Souls, Parallel Realities, and Perception
In the another area when people talk of old souls and new souls they try to give a chronology to spirit right as I’m understanding it it would just be a person’s uh character that he would assign to himself that somebody else could perceive or he was perceiving someone else being an old soul who had been around a certain planet for a long period of time more than somebody else.
It is simply the frequency vibration that may translate into your particular reality as what you call old or new. Right? But all souls are the same age which is ageless, eternal. Right.
I have something else. Uh there’s a new book by Wendell Steven who was writing this Indian book. It’s called contact k I believe in South Africa around 1974. And these people stated to their contract there was an antimatter universe that their I think their system came from uh and that they had taken up a group of scientists at that time on a little celestial tour apparently and asked them if they wanted to have earth join the confederation and the scientist said no they refused.
I haven’t read the book this is just worth information but do you know anything about that?
There is such a realm but in this way we will find that some of the information is more symbolic than literal to our perception.
They said there was the earth counterpart in this antimatter universe that’s called epox and it seemed to indicate we also would have counterparts in that universe as well.
This is likely but you have many parallel realities in many different universes. Uh-huh. There is the idea you call antimatter realm so to speak, negative energy realm in that way and there are counterparts there. Again, the definitions may simply be symbolic of something that is pertinent to your civilization.
What are we on particular? I have been told that an electronic watch will upset the magnetic field of if it is within your fundamental belief system that the idea of your electromagnetic field can be disrupted by other electromagnetic fields and it is a primary fundamental mass consciousness belief to some extent then it is very likely that you can create that type of aberration in your oric field.
It does not have to occur. It is likely that there will always be some perturbation of your oric field by any other electromagnetic field to some extent simply because you are interacting as a series of electromagnetic fields. It is a fundamental vibratory belief system within your reality.
This does not necessarily mean that it always has to be as negative as you might think. But there can be interaction. Yes.
Only way to get around that is to wear your watch in your right hand supposedly. You can also simply not wear a watch since you are always now anywhere.
It does exist because you created to exist. But you do regulate its flow.
Asker: Our reality why is it so [messy]?
What type of society are you in the habit of creating? One that has forgotten that it is its own higher self. Therefore, one that does not remember it is in control of its reality. Therefore, one that may seem to set up scenarios in which it appears to be in opposition to any definition you would give to a higher sense.
The reality you have created allows you to be able to conceive that what you call your negative ego is what is creating the idea of the energy that you use rather than simply recognizing that the energy is your consciousness. that the negative ego in this way is not what creates consciousness.
It is consciousness that creates the negative ego.
Asker: So in that consciousness are we referring to higher consciousness? What you may term higher?
Bashar: Yes. But what we would prefer to simply recognize as one consciousness.
The habit of continuing to think that you are a lower consciousness that has a higher consciousness is what continues to be the opportunity for you to create seeming discrepancies between the two levels because you create two levels to exist. So they can have discrepancies.
Asker: How how does the principle of the east work in the sense of that one consciousness it is a reflection to some degree like many other tools recognizing certain patterns within the mass consciousness.
Bashar: Some of these patterns because again of the separations you have created may be instilled within the mass sub or the mass unconsciousness but recognitions of the mass consciousness vibration agreements they are to some extent nonetheless.
So how does this pattern um it’s just a symbol that’s reflected in a sense let us say it is a symbolic way to read the contract that you have made with everyone to recognize the overlapping patterns and interactions that you have agreed to have with everyone. It is one way to reflect these ideas to yourself. There are many tools.
That’s interesting. I bet you I have a curious question. How do you a curious question? I have a curiosity that I’m going to try and put into a question. Try and a curiosity. You are going to try to put into a question. Okay, here it goes.
My mind. How do you how do you uh perceive what how could you describe very well? Uh what?
Mostly as feelings, mostly as mostly as interactions, connections in a sense what you would call, as we have said, holographically. We see the idea or perceive the idea or feel the idea of you as a conglomerate of interaction even though we do recognize you have your own signature vibration.
So you do see the interactions say of the individual and then you also can see the interactions that they are connected with with their mass consciousness and other in a sense although perhaps to clarify the idea it is recognizing the definition of all of the interactions that you are that gives us the ability to recognize you
As an individual, let us say we recognize you by your combination code. The combination of all the interactions you are being gives rise to the individual you consider yourself to be following.
So how do I translate? who translate as an individual that is connected in many different ways and recognizing many of the connections and recognizing not some of them. But this is as we will say not to be demeaning typical of your society at this time.
But in this way we do not define the idea of how we perceive you to make a judgment upon it or a comparison. So when you ask how do we perceive you, we are always going to perceive you as perfect like anything else. Whatever interactions you are choosing to be are the interactions you obviously feel you need to be or you would be something else. That is how we perceive you. We simply read what we see as the interactions that make you what you are.
The cloud chamber may only cause to confuse.
I always get this image of of patterns with interconnected day
Bashar: That will suffice as your symbol of understanding. Suffice it to say that on your own terms you understand. You have your symbol for it and your symbol for you is correct.
How do you perceive yourself? And much the same way. Although we also allow ourselves to recognize that we are the interactions we are perceiving. That in a sense is the difference.
Whereas even many times you may perceive the idea of all the interactions you are connected to, we perceive ourselves as the interactions themselves.
Does that then allow for all of you to be aware of where you are all the time at work? Of course, because we are each other consciously as we have said, everything is the same one thing manifesting in multi-dimensional aspects simultaneously. Everything is the same one thing.
But but right now you’re sitting here and a part of you is discussing these issues with us. The idea that I am contains the aspect or ability to communicate in a fashion that you can conceive of with you. Yes. In a sense, however, this is still a part of the interaction. I am. It is not something separate from me, so to speak, from my point of view.
Yes, I understand that fundamentally the I am. But I need to pinpoint it even further. Why? Because I want to. All right.
Um so that at this time that you’re speaking with us, this this part of you that I understand isn’t a part of you. Um I don’t have the right words for it. Uh you are also aware of the other experiences and interactions that are a part of who you are to varying degrees.
What do you mean by that? Simply what it says to varying degrees according to the purpose that they serve to be aware of them. But you’re consciously aware.
So does the varying degrees um does it cover the range of emotions? This is what is causing the misunderstanding.
Everything within All-That-Is, if it exists as something you can recognize as an identifiable separateness, to some degree must be separated and limited to some degree. Therefore, even we function with the idea of some degree of limitation. Otherwise, we would simply be the idea of the homogeneous one All-That-Is. and he would not perceive us in any way, shape, or form as differentiated at all.
Yes. Therefore, to varying degrees of limitation according to the purpose that it serves, I allow my consciousness of the interactions that I am to fluctuate to serve different purposes, such as communicating with your civilization. But still, I recognize that the communication between us is not something outside of me, but a part of me.
Healing, Purpose, and Reality Creation
There are many ways. Again, none is so much higher than another way. You are living light and in this way you can identify with the idea that you are a perfect pattern so to speak you have the idea of the pattern you prefer to be.
Knowing what that pattern is, knowing the feeling that it represents, the vibration of anything that is not that pattern, including the idea deceive.
Go ahead. How do you feel? You just did by thinking of it.
You do know how to do it. It is automatic. When you think of a concept, you are that reality. You are that vibration. You cannot conceive of nonexistence. Everything you conceive of is real in that way.
Particularly in your reality, the idea of a notion that has anything at all to do with another part of what you recognize to be your reality is instantaneously the reality you are, as soon as you conceive of it.
So when you have the notion of sending what you consider to be light and love to someone else, it is sent automatically. There is no process involved. You become the idea and it is done.
Now it is still up to the other individual whether or not they wish to, in a sense, receive the gift, so to speak. But it is always going to be there for them to be able to receive it when they are ready to.
You follow me—like even years later, in what is time to love.
Asker: I was going to ask this existence. What’s the use of it? What are we talking to learn to experience it?
It is one of the ways you can experience All-That-Is. Why not?
Well, fair enough. If you feel that um you’ve got a handle on it and you’ve been in and out of most of the holes in this world, right?
The idea primarily of what you would represent to be your universal reality in your civilization, as you call it, has been primarily for the purpose of experiencing all the different forms of limitation that there is to experience.
But what for? What? Why not?
Well, why have you done it? Not to the same extent.
Why not? Because it simply does not suit my definition of myself.
No, maybe it doesn’t suit me. Then you wouldn’t be here. Okay.
Now, the idea once again is that when you allow your physical reality to be an obvious reflection of what you did choose to experience, then you’ll begin to see why you chose it.
But as long as you refuse to acknowledge that where you are is where you put yourself, then you are not saying you are in control. Thus, you do not give yourself the opportunity—since you do not believe you are in control of where you are—to understand why you are where you are. Very good.
Bashar: All you need to do is take it for granted that you chose to be here for a reason. So ask yourself, why are you here?
Asker: What is the point of it?
Bashar: This from the overall confusion of looking for purposes, that seem to be ultimate purposes.
All-That-Is existed before the creation of the idea purpose.
Superphysics Note!
Purpose is one of the creations of All-That-Is. Therefore, that which has existed before purpose was created does not need a purpose to continue to exist. It simply is what it is.
You are a part of All-That-Is. There are many aspects, many ways to experience All-That-Is. If you are experiencing one of those aspects, it is simply because foundationally—not specifically, foundationally—because you wish to have that particular experience of that particular fragment of All-That-Is.
So that you will know that there is then to you more understanding of what it truly means to experience All-That-Is, because this is simply one of the ways you can experience it and you want to experience as many ways as you can. So why not?
Now you may in any particular life such as this create your own specific purposes, goals, desires, wants, joys, struggles and so forth, and those can serve you. You can understand why you have created them as well.
But those are your specific desires within any given fragment life time frame, and has really not so much to do with the overall idea of, well, what is the purpose anyway to any of it.
All-That-Is does not need a purpose to be anything it can imagine itself to be. It simply does so because that is the nature of All-That-Is—to be what it can imagine itself to be, thus experiencing another aspect of itself.
tape breaks here
Your life has been going just fine. in and of itself can allow you more conscious awareness of the idea that your life will always continue to accelerate in that same way.
Thus many times it is not so much that you may find that realizations will bring you understandings of how to be so much different than you have been.
But to simply recognize that what you have been doing for the you that you have created yourself to be at any given moment in your past has always been the perfect thing to do and always will continue to be the perfect thing to do according to the new definitions you have of yourself.
Crow Communication
I was curious about..
There is no such thing as idle curiosity. When you create curiosity, you have a key to answer your own questions.
Curiosity allows you to delve into the dimension of your imagination and know that you are creating your reality and that a question is the recognition of an answer but separated from yourself.
They are always communicating. Maybe you are the one trying to listen, but they do not have to try to communicate.
They are always communicating. Now, what do you imagine that their relevancy is for your reality? What have you created as your end of receiving the communication into what symbols have you created their communication to you? Always communicating they are what have you turned their communication into in your reality.
[LAUGHTER at the pun]
There are 2 types of free will.
- Free will of your physical being
- Free will of your higher consciousness, which to the physical being from time to time may seem like predestination.
But the free will of the higher consciousness only manifest itself in the most generalized of themes. How you experience those themes is completely up to the free will of your physiological personality.
Leave a Comment
Thank you for your comment!
It will appear after review.